Is US approach to Syrian conflict correct?

To view this site, you need to have Flash Player 9.0.115 or later installed. Click here to get the latest Flash player.

August 28, 2013, 8:24 am
Print Article

(NECN) - U.N. investigators say there is evidence to suggest some chemical substance was used in an attack that Doctors Without Borders says killed 355 people.

The Obama administration considers action and while the president hasn't made an announcement, a strike could come as soon as Thursday.

One option the U.S. will not be using is putting troops into Syria; the Obama administration says they don't want to get invovled in the country's civil war, they just want to stop the use of chemical weapons.

Dr. Farouk El-Baz, Egyptian scientist and professor at Boston University, joined NECN to share his thoughts on America's role in the conflict.

"I do not know whether whatever the administration is planning is the right thing to do," said El-Baz. "I still remember what happened with Iraq, with Saddam Hussein."

El-Baz criticized the length of time it has taken the U.S. to get involved.

"We could have done this way back, and we could have changed the situation, two years ago. I do not know why we would wait two years."

Tags: barack Obama, Boston University, BU, President Obama, John McCain, Syria, damascus, Farouk El-Baz, Bashar Assad , chemical weapons, bashar al-assad, chemical warfare
Check out these events for something fun this weekend
Karin O'Keefe discusses some deals and steals
Mara Dolan discusses Tuesday night's 'State of the Commonwealth' address to be delivered by Deval Patrick
Alex Power-Hays discusses making the video; challenge for kids to make their own video
Doctor John Mafi discusses the role of exercise in helping your aches
Student Reporter Peter Costanza finds out what people think of the online currency
This small gadget can be used to make quick, small sushi rolls
Student Reporter Zeban Jaggi finds out how people cope on the holiday