| October 31, 2009 Ford workers reject contract changes
|
DETROIT (AP) - Ford Motor Co. workers have overwhelmingly
rejected contract changes that would have allowed the automaker to
cut labor costs.
The United Auto Workers union had given local unions until
Monday to complete voting. But a person briefed on the voting said
Saturday that the contract changes have been rejected by large
margins. The person asked not to be named because the UAW hasn't
announced the results yet.
The UAW and Ford agreed to the contract changes several weeks
ago, but Ford workers needed to ratify them. Ford has 41,000
UAW-represented workers.
Two large union locals in Kentucky and Ford's home city of
Dearborn rejected the contract Friday, sealing its fate. Those
unions together represent 13,000 Ford workers. Exact tallies
weren't available, but at least 12 UAW locals representing about
27,500 workers vetoed the deal, many overwhelmingly. Only about
four locals with a total of 7,000 members favored the pact.
Ford sought the deal to bring its labor costs in line with
Detroit rivals Chrysler Group LLC and General Motors Co., both of
which won concessions from the union as they headed into bankruptcy
protection earlier this year. Under pattern bargaining, the three
automakers usually match pay, benefits and other contract
provisions.
But workers weren't convinced they should make more concessions,
since Ford avoided bankruptcy and is considered healthier than its
rivals. Rocky Comito, president of UAW Local 862 in Louisville,
said
Friday that workers also felt they were being asked to
sacrifice more than the company's executives. Ford CEO Alan Mulally
made $17.7 million last year, although that was down 22 percent
from the year before.
"Some want to see management give more at the upper level,"
Comito said.
Ford was offering workers a $1,000 bonus if they ratified the
contract. But the contract also would have frozen entry-level pay
and changed some work rules.
Speaking at a community event in Detroit on Friday, UAW
President Ron Gettelfinger said there wouldn't be a revote if the
contract changes failed.
"If it fails, there would be no reason to go back to the
bargaining table," Gettelfinger said. "We have a democratic
process in place. People have a right to express themselves. We
recognize there's a lot of misinformation about it out there, but
that is what it is."
Associated Press Writers Corey Williams in Detroit and Janet
Cappiello Blake in Louisville contributed to this report.
(Copyright 2009 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Related Stories:
[48 weeks ago]
[38 weeks ago]
[14 weeks ago]
[1 week ago]