At Boston, Massachusetts: as of 9:54 PM
|
|
|
|
| | | | Breaking News [ 1 hour ago ] | | |
|
| | |
|
POLITICS:
Giuliani Part 2: Hope is not is a strategy
| TOP VIDEOS |
| |
|
|
| September 3, 2008 Giuliani Part 2: Hope is not is a strategy
|
(NECN: St. Paul, MN) - Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani spoke Wednesday during the Republican National Convention. He sharply contrasted the experiences between the McCain-Palin ticket and the Obama-Biden ticket.
"John McCain will bring about the change that will create jobs and prosperity. He will lower taxes so our economy can grow. He will reduce government spending to strengthen our dollar."
He criticized Obama and Democrats for rarely mentioning the attacks of September 11, saying that they are in a "state of denial" about the threats that face our country.
To view Part 1 of Giuliana's speech CLICK HERE
To view Part 3 of Giuliani's speech CLICK HERE
BELOW IS PREPARED TEXT OF RUDY GIULIANI'S ADDRESS TO THE RNC:
Well, no one can look at John McCain and say that he is not
ready to be commander in chief.
So, our opponents want to reframe the debate. They would have
you believe that this election is about change versus more of the
same. But that's really a false choice. Because "change" is not a
destination ... just as "hope" is not a strategy.
John McCain will bring about the change that will create jobs
and prosperity. He will lower taxes so our economy can grow. He
will reduce government spending to strengthen our dollar. He will
expand free trade so we can be even more competitive. He will lead
us toward an America that will be independent of foreign oil by an
all-of-the-above approach, including nuclear power and offshore
drilling.
This is the kind of change we need.
And he will keep us on offense against terrorism at home and
abroad. For four days in Denver and for the past 18 months
Democrats have been afraid to use the words "Islamic terrorism."
During their convention, the Democrats rarely mentioned the attacks
of Sept. 11.
They are in a state of denial about the threat that faces us now
and in the future.
You need to face your enemy in order to defeat them. John McCain
will face this threat and lead us on to victory.
Look at just one example in a lifetime of principled stands -
John McCain's support for the troop surge in Iraq. The Democratic
Party had given up on Iraq. And I believe, ladies and gentlemen,
that when they gave up on Iraq they were giving up on America. The
Democratic leader in the Senate said so: "America has lost."
Well, if America lost, who won? Al-Qaida? Bin Laden? In the
single biggest policy decision of this election, John McCain got it
right and Barack Obama got it wrong.
If Barack Obama had been president, there would have been no
troop surge and our troops would have been withdrawn in defeat.
Sen. McCain was the candidate most associated with the surge.
And it was unpopular.
What do you think most other candidates would have done in that
situation? They would have acted in their own self-interest by
changing their position. How many times have we seen Barack Obama
do that?
Obama was going to take public financing for his campaign, until
he didn't.
Obama was against wiretapping before he voted for it.
When speaking to a pro-Israel group, Obama favored an undivided
Jerusalem. Until the very next day when he changed his mind.
I hope for his sake, Joe Biden got that VP thing in writing.
John McCain said, I'd rather lose an election than a war.
Because that's John McCain.
When Russia rolled over Georgia, John McCain knew exactly how to
respond.
Having been to that part of the world many times and having
developed a clear worldview over many years, John knew where he
stood. Within hours, he established a very strong, informed
position that let the world know exactly how he'll respond as
president. At exactly the right time, John McCain said, "We're all
Georgians."
Obama's first instinct was to create a moral equivalency - that
"both sides" should "show restraint." The same moral
equivalency that he has displayed in discussing the Palestinian
Authority and the state of Israel.
Later, after discussing it with his 300 foreign policy advisers,
he changed his position and suggested that "the UN Security
Council" could find a solution. Apparently, none of his 300
advisers told him that Russia has a veto on any UN action. Finally
Obama put out a statement that looked ... well, it looked a lot
like John McCain's.
Here's some free advice: Sen. Obama, next time just call John
McCain.
 Related Stories: [1 year ago] [1 year ago] [1 year ago] [1 year ago] |
|
|
|
|