| February 24, 2008 Uncut: Obama speaks to voters in Ohio
|
LORAIN, Ohio (AP) - Barack Obama accused Democratic presidential
rival Hillary Rodham Clinton on Sunday of trying to walk away from
a long record of support for NAFTA, the free trade agreement that
he said has cost 50,000 jobs in Ohio, site of next week's primary.
At the same time, he said attempts to repeal the trade deal
"would probably result in more job losses than job gains in the
United States."
One day after Clinton angrily accused him of distorting her
record on the North American Free Trade Agreement in mass mailings,
the Illinois senator was eager to rekindle the long-distance
debate, using passages from the former first lady's book as well as
her own words.
"Ten years after NAFTA passed, Senator Clinton said it was good
for America," Obama said. "Well, I don't think NAFTA has been
good for America - and I never have."
"The fact is, she was saying great things about NAFTA until she
started running for president," Obama told an audience at a
factory that makes wall board, located in a working class community
west of Cleveland.
"A couple years after it passed, she said NAFTA was a 'free and
fair trade agreement' and that it was 'proving its worth.' And in
2004, she said, "I think, on balance, NAFTA has been good for New
York and America," he said.
A spokesman for Clinton, Phil Singer, said the former first lady
was critical of NAFTA long before she ran for president. He cited
remarks from March 2000 in which she said, "What
happened to NAFTA
I think was we inherited an agreement that we didn't get everything
we should have got out of it in my opinion. I think the NAFTA
agreement was flawed."
Singer also said that in 2004 in Illinois, Obama spoke
positively of the trade agreement, saying the United States had
"benefited enormously" from exports under NAFTA.
The trade agreement has long been unpopular in the industrial
Midwest, where critics blame it for lost jobs and shuttered
factories, many of which once employed union workers who tend to
vote Democratic.
Ohio and Texas both hold primaries next week, with 334 delegates
combined, and former President Clinton has said publicly his wife
probably needs to win both of them if she is to win the Democratic
presidential nomination.
Vermont and Rhode Island also hold primaries on March 4, but
have far fewer delegates and have not attracted nearly as much
attention.
On another issue, Obama said he was not concerned that
Republicans might attempt to depict him as unpatriotic if he
becomes the Democratic nominee.
Asked about a series of events, such as not placing his hand
over his heart during the national anthem, he said, "The way I
will respond to it is with the truth. That I owe everything I am to
this country."
He also said patriotism had more than one definition, and that
Republicans had presided over a war "in which our troops did not
get the body armor they needed" or were sent into the war zone
without enough training.
Polls show Clinton with a narrowing lead in Ohio, where trade
has long been a sensitive issue.
Given that backdrop, the issue is the core of Obama's drive to
win the Ohio primary and possibly force Clinton from the race.
At the news conference, he noted that she had said Saturday that
the agreement was negotiated by President George H.W. Bush, and
passed and signed into law while her husband was in the White
House.
He said Clinton has "essentially presented herself as
co-president during the Clinton years. Every good thing that
happened she says she was a part of and so the notion that you can
selectively pick what you take credit for and then run away from
what isn't politically convenient, that doesn't make sense."
On Saturday, Clinton called attention to her plan to fix
problems with NAFTA and a commitment against any future trade deals
"unless they are positive for American workers."
To an audience of Boilermakers Union members and their families,
Obama promised the same thing, with particular attention paid to
labor and environmental concerns.
"Now, if we're honest with ourselves, we'll acknowledge that we
can't stop globalization in its tracks and that some of these jobs
aren't coming back," he said. "But what I refuse to accept is
that we have to stand idly by while workers watch their jobs get
shipped overseas."
(Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
Related Stories:
[1 year ago]
[1 year ago]
[1 year ago]
[1 year ago]