Baker: Massachusetts Should Look Into Legal Sports Betting - NECN
Massachusetts

Massachusetts

The latest news from around the state

Baker: Massachusetts Should Look Into Legal Sports Betting

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    SCOTUS Ruling Strikes Down Federal Ban on Sports Betting

    What impact will Monday's Supreme Court ruling ending a federal ban on sports betting have on Massachusetts?

    (Published Monday, May 14, 2018)

    Massachusetts officials on Monday began weighing the pros and cons of legalized sports betting after the U.S. Supreme Court gave states the green light to consider it.

    Republican Gov. Charlie Baker and Democratic legislative leaders said they discussed the high court ruling and its potential ramifications for the state during their regularly scheduled weekly meeting. None were willing to commit to a pathway for legally wagering on sports events, with Baker saying a lot more "homework" needed to be done on the issue.

    Democratic House Speaker Robert DeLeo said the choice could come down to what he called the "integrity" of any sports betting system versus the potential tax revenue it could generate for the state.

    "I think there are a lot of major questions right now to be able to say yes or no," said DeLeo.

    Baker Says Mass. Should Consider Sports Betting After Ruling

    [NECN] Baker Says Mass. Should Consider Sports Betting After SCOTUS Ruling

    Gov. Charlie Baker says Massachusetts should consider legal sports betting in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision to strike down a federal ban.

    (Published Monday, May 14, 2018)

    Senate President Harriette Chandler, a Worcester Democrat, agreed the issue should be considered ``thoughtfully and carefully.''

    Neither Democratic leader ruled out action before the July 31 close of the legislative session.

    A bill filed earlier this year included instructions that a special commission be created within 30 days of the Supreme Court overturning the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 - as it did on Monday - and that the panel conduct a "comprehensive study" of regulating online sports betting in Massachusetts. That bill, however, has yet to be discharged from a legislative committee.

    The same bill sought to make permanent temporary regulations that allow online fantasy sports contests, like those offered by Boston-based DraftKings, to be played in the state.

    DraftKings said on Monday it had been preparing in advance of the Supreme Court ruling to launch a sports betting platform and apply for operating licenses in states that move toward legalization.

    "It will be a totally interactive experience for the sports fan and the viewership will change from passive, sitting on your couch, to actively engaging and watching while also playing games, betting, chatting with friends and all sorts of things," said Jason Robins, chief executive of DraftKings, during a conference call with reporters.

    What Does Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting Mean?

    [NECN] What Does Supreme Court Ruling on Sports Betting Mean?

    Dusty Hecker, Partner with Posternak Blankstein & Lund LLP, sits down with necn's Brian Burnell to discuss how the Supreme Court has opened the door for legalized sports betting and what it means.

    (Published Monday, May 14, 2018)

    The wider legalization of sports betting could lead to the company creating more jobs in Boston, he added.

    One consideration for Massachusetts, Baker said, would be to gauge the impact of legalized sports betting on the state's first two resort casinos, one in Springfield and the other in Everett, that are scheduled to open in the coming months.

    Each of the four major North American sports leagues responded to the ruling Monday.

    "The NFL's long-standing and unwavering commitment to protecting the integrity of our game remains absolute," the league said in a statement. "Congress has long-recognized the potential harms posed by sports betting to the integrity of sporting contests and the public confidence in these events. Given that history, we intend to call on Congress again, this time to enact a core regulatory framework for legalized sports betting. We also will work closely with our clubs to ensure that any state efforts that move forward in the meantime protect our fans and the integrity of our game."

    "We remain in favor of a federal framework that would provide a uniform approach to sports gambling in states that choose to permit it," the NBA said in a statement of its own.

    The MLB said it "will continue to seek the proper protections for our sport, in partnership with other professional sports. Our most important priority is protecting the integrity of our games."

    "We will review our current practices and policies and decide whether adjustments are needed," the NHL added.

    Get the latest from necn anywhere, anytime

    • Download the App

      Available for IOS and Android