Immigrant Children Don't Have Right to Free Lawyer: Court - NECN
National & International News
The day’s top national and international news

Immigrant Children Don't Have Right to Free Lawyer: Court

    processing...

    NEWSLETTERS

    5 Reasons Why Québec City is The Place to be This Summer!
    AP file
    FILE - In this Sept. 10, 2014 file photo, detained immigrant children line up in the cafeteria at the Karnes County Residential Center, a temporary home for immigrant women and children detained at the border, in Karnes City, Texas.

    Immigrant children are not entitled to attorneys paid for by the government when facing deportation, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.

    The judges rejected a claim by the American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant groups that children have a constitutional due process right to a free attorney.

    A system already exists to give the children a fair hearing, and requiring the government to provide free attorneys would be an expense that would "strain an already overextended immigration system," a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said.

    The plaintiffs said many of the thousands of children the government seeks to deport each year appear before judges without a lawyer because they can't afford one or find one to take their cases for free.

    Honda Odyssey Tops Minivan Crash Test List

    [NATL] Honda Odyssey Tops Minivan Crash Test List

    The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has released new crash ratings for minivans.

    (Published Thursday, Aug. 16, 2018)

    The result is an unfair process that pits children with no ability to navigate complex legal issues against seasoned government attorneys, the groups say.

    Ahilan Arulanantham, legal director at the ACLU of Southern California, said the group had not decided its next step.

    "The statistical evidence, which the court acknowledged, is that children are many, many times more likely to win their cases if they have legal representation," he said.

    The 9th Circuit considered a case filed by a 13-year-old boy identified only as "C.J." who fled Honduras with his mother after facing death threats, including a gun to his head, when he refused to join a gang.

    They arrived in the U.S. in 2014, and the boy was placed in deportation proceedings three months later.

    An immigration judge told the boy's mother he had a right to an attorney, but she said she did not have money, according to the court ruling. The case went forward without an attorney, and the judge rejected the boy's asylum application.

    WH: Cannot Guarantee Trump Didn't Use N-Word

    [NATL] WH Defends Trump's 'Dog' Comment, Says They Cannot Guarantee Trump Didn't Use N-Word

    The White House defended President Donald Trump calling former protégée Omarosa Manigault-Newman a "dog" in a Tuesday press conference. Press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders also could not guarantee that Trump has never used the N-word on record, but doubled down in his defense. 

    (Published Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2018)

    The boy sought a free court-appointed attorney for himself and other immigrant children who face deportation hearings.

    Ninth Circuit Judge Consuelo Callahan said an effective process was already in place to safeguard the rights of immigrant children.

    An immigration judge is required to fully and fairly ascertain and assess all the facts in the case, not just act as a neutral arbiter, according to Callahan. An appeals panel can send cases back to immigration judges if they fail to perform that duty.

    Arulanantham said an immigration judge was not an adequate substitute for a lawyer.

    In C.J.'s case, the 9th Circuit said the immigration judge made some mistakes, but none that would have changed the outcome. The court upheld the immigration judge's decision to deny asylum.

    In a separate opinion, 9th Circuit Judge John Owens said the court was not ruling on whether immigrant children who come to the U.S. without their parents or guardians are entitled to free attorneys. Owens said that's a different case that "could lead to a different answer."

    Bridge Collapses Over Italian City, Killing More Than 20

    [NATL] Bridge Collapses Over Italian City, Killing More Than 20

    A bridge over the Italian city of Genoa collapsed during a sudden, violent storm, opening up a huge gulf in the Morandi Bridge and killing at least 20 people.

    (Published Tuesday, Aug. 14, 2018)